By Drew
#6870 Also JOHNNY ROCKER WHAT'S UP NIGGA
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Drew
#6873
Reed wrote:
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.

Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.


Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.


That's why ya had me bud icon_lol


Naw, I got jaw slacked watching your greatness unfold. hahahah. but still, middle finger for that Jenn boot botch. HAHA the only time I tried to convince you post merge. THE ONE TIME. AND I FAILED. HAHA


I'm stubborn as fuck. Had a feeling that may fuck us over icon_laughing
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Drew
#6874
Reed wrote:Can the premerge boot read everything?


I just saw him reading the Ponderosa forum.
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Reed
#6875
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Jeff Probst wrote:If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.

Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.


Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.


That's why ya had me bud icon_lol


Naw, I got jaw slacked watching your greatness unfold. hahahah. but still, middle finger for that Jenn boot botch. HAHA the only time I tried to convince you post merge. THE ONE TIME. AND I FAILED. HAHA


I'm stubborn as fuck. Had a feeling that may fuck us over icon_laughing


Oh well, at least I get to nag you about this over and over again. ANd fuck the Warriors.
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Drew
#6876 Sorry I can't hear you over Steph's unanimous MVP vote #SoCal
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Reed
#6877 #NBAAWARDSARELIKESURVIVORVOTES Haha. But yeah, I just can't wait to root for my Timberwolves next season.
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Drew
#6878 JOHN we should have voted Missy out and Kept you we robbed this season of your greatness.
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Joaquin
#6879 Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom.

And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)
User avatar
 

Joaquin

  • Juror
  • Posts: 402
By Drew
#6881
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom.

And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


Damn that would be an interesting read.
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Reed
#6883
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom.

And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


Sounds like something that I can digest.

Speaking of a Dale move, he made one good move against me that flipped me inside out by the way.

"At least Drew didn't promise, but you did. He gets my jury vote."

That was a good slick move by Dale, looking back it made me realize why I wanted to try and make the work with Dale stick to the wall. I wanted them jury votes. That's something I learned, and would abuse a little if i play another ORG next time.
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Jenn
#6884
Joaquin wrote:If anything, that makes me want to vote her less. I have very specific views on Survivor, which I would love to talk to you about (I'm actually writing a research paper on it right now), one of which is that if you need immunity to get to the end, you don't deserve to win. I'm sure at least a decent amount of y'all will disagree.


I think there's a fine line between needing immunity and just having it. It also depends on when they really needed the immunity. Kim, for example, won the last four challenges in One World, but I don't think she would've been voted out even if she lost them. Even for Tom and JT. Sure they won a lot of immunities, but I don't think that should take away from their 100% approval rating with the jury.

For someone like Rob, Tyson, Danni, or Sophie, the last immunity was really important for them, but I don't think one immunity should take away from their entire game. For me, it's when someone has to consistently rely on immunities that it cheapens their worth (Fabio, Bob, Mike). Either way, though, I think real life Dan said it best when he told Mike that the immunity necklace can't save you in front of a jury. Plenty of runner-ups were immunity beasts to the end (Kelly and Ozzy, especially). Immunity run or no, I'm voting for the person I liked best.
User avatar
 

Jenn

  • Juror
  • Posts: 475
By Reed
#6887
Jenn wrote:
Joaquin wrote:If anything, that makes me want to vote her less. I have very specific views on Survivor, which I would love to talk to you about (I'm actually writing a research paper on it right now), one of which is that if you need immunity to get to the end, you don't deserve to win. I'm sure at least a decent amount of y'all will disagree.


I think there's a fine line between needing immunity and just having it. It also depends on when they really needed the immunity. Kim, for example, won the last four challenges in One World, but I don't think she would've been voted out even if she lost them. Even for Tom and JT. Sure they won a lot of immunities, but I don't think that should take away from their 100% approval rating with the jury.

For someone like Rob, Tyson, Danni, or Sophie, the last immunity was really important for them, but I don't think one immunity should take away from their entire game. For me, it's when someone has to consistently rely on immunities that it cheapens their worth (Fabio, Bob, Mike). Either way, though, I think real life Dan said it best when he told Mike that the immunity necklace can't save you in front of a jury. Plenty of runner-ups were immunity beasts to the end (Kelly and Ozzy, especially). Immunity run or no, I'm voting for the person I liked best.


So you're vote is for Dale? :P
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Jenn
#6892 Yes, but only if he jumps in front of a moving vehicle after my vote for him is revealed.
User avatar
 

Jenn

  • Juror
  • Posts: 475
By Drew
#6893
Reed wrote:
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom.

And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


Sounds like something that I can digest.

Speaking of a Dale move, he made one good move against me that flipped me inside out by the way.

"At least Drew didn't promise, but you did. He gets my jury vote."

That was a good slick move by Dale, looking back it made me realize why I wanted to try and make the work with Dale stick to the wall. I wanted them jury votes. That's something I learned, and would abuse a little if i play another ORG next time.


He told me that to. I was vague enough to keep him out of the loop, yet make him feel like he needed me at the same time. I think he respected that over taking the easy road of just lying bold faced.
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Reed
#6894
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom. or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory

Sounds like something that I can digest.

Speaking of a Dale move, he made one good move against me that flipped me inside out by the way.

"At least Drew didn't promise, but you did. He gets my jury vote."

That was a good slick move by Dale, looking back it made me realize why I wanted to try and make the work with Dale stick to the wall. I wanted them jury votes. That's something I learned, and would abuse a little if i play another ORG next time.


He told me that to. I was vague enough to keep him out of the loop, yet make him feel like he needed me at the same time. I think he respected that over taking the easy road of just lying bold faced.


That was smoove. I really learned a lot in this game. Maybe I could run for Mayor next election..... lol
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Drew
#6895
Reed wrote:
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom. or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory

Sounds like something that I can digest.

Speaking of a Dale move, he made one good move against me that flipped me inside out by the way.

"At least Drew didn't promise, but you did. He gets my jury vote."

That was a good slick move by Dale, looking back it made me realize why I wanted to try and make the work with Dale stick to the wall. I wanted them jury votes. That's something I learned, and would abuse a little if i play another ORG next time.


He told me that to. I was vague enough to keep him out of the loop, yet make him feel like he needed me at the same time. I think he respected that over taking the easy road of just lying bold faced.


That was smoove. I really learned a lot in this game. Maybe I could run for Mayor next election..... lol


You aren't corrupt enough to be mayor bud.
User avatar
 

Drew

  • Juror
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Alberta Canada
By Reed
#6896
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Drew wrote:
Reed wrote:
Joaquin wrote:Yeah dog damn Russ picked a hell of a night to beastmode.

Depends on what you mean by "good". I thought Fabio was entertaining as hell so he's a great character. But in terms of gameplay relative to other winners, yeah he'd rank towards my bottom. or behavioral economic theory (which probably sounds like a bunch of humbo jumbo)


And yeah I'd be happy to share my paper. It's on whether Survivor decisions prescribe more to rational economic theory

Sounds like something that I can digest.

Speaking of a Dale move, he made one good move against me that flipped me inside out by the way.

"At least Drew didn't promise, but you did. He gets my jury vote."

That was a good slick move by Dale, looking back it made me realize why I wanted to try and make the work with Dale stick to the wall. I wanted them jury votes. That's something I learned, and would abuse a little if i play another ORG next time.


He told me that to. I was vague enough to keep him out of the loop, yet make him feel like he needed me at the same time. I think he respected that over taking the easy road of just lying bold faced.


That was smoove. I really learned a lot in this game. Maybe I could run for Mayor next election..... lol


You aren't corrupt enough to be mayor bud.


I'm doin it for the people!!!
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772
By Jeff Probst
#6901 And now you know why I told you fuckers pre-game to make moves in order to win and not wait until the end because itll be too late :P

Anyway, Hopefully you guys are all legends in the next all-stars seasons and don't waste your opportunities :D
User avatar
 

Jeff Probst

  • Site Admin
  • Posts: 1139
By Reed
#6903
Jeff Probst wrote:And now you know why I told you fuckers pre-game to make moves in order to win and not wait until the end because itll be too late :P

Anyway, Hopefully you guys are all legends in the next all-stars seasons and don't waste your opportunities :D


Can't believe this ain't the real Jeff Probst talking right now.

Yeah I learned where I screwed up, and next time, I'm stacking on coffees. Also, maybe I could apply as host Jeff? hahaha
User avatar
 

Reed

  • Juror
  • Posts: 772