- Tue May 10, 2016 9:47:27 pm
#6839
It feels wrong for Dan to not be here shitting on all of us.
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:47:49 pm
#6841
I just cant wait to ask my jury question. Ha!
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:48:08 pm
#6842
That Aussie prob eating lunch rn
Drew wrote:It feels wrong for Dan to not be here shitting on all of us.
That Aussie prob eating lunch rn
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:50:41 pm
#6845
He's probably eating a dick right now.
So I'd say more brunch than lunch.
Reed wrote:Drew wrote:It feels wrong for Dan to not be here shitting on all of us.
That Aussie prob eating lunch rn
He's probably eating a dick right now.
So I'd say more brunch than lunch.
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:52:24 pm
#6847
Honestly though, I'm debating whether or not to just ignore Dale at final tribal. He wants attention, so I might just not give it to him.
Reed wrote:I just cant wait to ask my jury question. Ha!
Honestly though, I'm debating whether or not to just ignore Dale at final tribal. He wants attention, so I might just not give it to him.
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:53:32 pm
#6849
Well, we could go with whatever or however we want it. But I guess this is (Jury moment) about our self pleasure, if that pleases you the most then voila. Haha. I was just want genuine answers from them. Too bad Missy ain't sitting in that FTC. I could go on and make another fairy tale speech.
Jenn wrote:Reed wrote:I just cant wait to ask my jury question. Ha!
Honestly though, I'm debating whether or not to just ignore Dale at final tribal. He wants attention, so I might just not give it to him.
Well, we could go with whatever or however we want it. But I guess this is (Jury moment) about our self pleasure, if that pleases you the most then voila. Haha. I was just want genuine answers from them. Too bad Missy ain't sitting in that FTC. I could go on and make another fairy tale speech.
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:56:28 pm
#6850
I want Val to make it to the end so bad.
Yeah I think we should all make a pact to ignore Dale at FTC.
Dale COULD have won if he had stopped being a dick, banded Jaclyn and So together and dragged them to the end (no offense, So) - I would have respected that he was aware enough to realize who the threats were and how he had a chance to win. But tonight ended any possibility of him winning.
This is probably weird, but if it's Nadiya/Dale/Jaclyn, I think I might want Jaclyn to win, just because I don't want Dale to get any satisfaction whatsoever.
Yeah I think we should all make a pact to ignore Dale at FTC.
Dale COULD have won if he had stopped being a dick, banded Jaclyn and So together and dragged them to the end (no offense, So) - I would have respected that he was aware enough to realize who the threats were and how he had a chance to win. But tonight ended any possibility of him winning.
This is probably weird, but if it's Nadiya/Dale/Jaclyn, I think I might want Jaclyn to win, just because I don't want Dale to get any satisfaction whatsoever.
- Tue May 10, 2016 9:57:42 pm
#6851
Damn. That would be unfair to Nadiya though. She played a hell of a game. And she doesn't deserve to pay the consequence of Dale's 10 inch of a dick.
Joaquin wrote:I want Val to make it to the end so bad.
Yeah I think we should all make a pact to ignore Dale at FTC.
Dale COULD have won if he had stopped being a dick, banded Jaclyn and So together and dragged them to the end (no offense, So) - I would have respected that he was aware enough to realize who the threats were and how he had a chance to win. But tonight ended any possibility of him winning.
This is probably weird, but if it's Nadiya/Dale/Jaclyn, I think I might want Jaclyn to win, just because I don't want Dale to get any satisfaction whatsoever.
Damn. That would be unfair to Nadiya though. She played a hell of a game. And she doesn't deserve to pay the consequence of Dale's 10 inch of a dick.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:00:26 pm
#6854
She played well, but I don't think she's as good as some of y'all think - I think she does lack some of the social nuance that I'd like in a winner (aka Val), which I can explain further if you don't understand. At the same time, this is Parvati syndrome (in HvV) - being associated with Russell was a pretty decently large reason she lost.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:00:46 pm
#6855
This is how I see it.
If anyone has a burning passion to voice something with Dale, they can go ahead.
Otherwise, I think by refusing to play into his delusions, he will self implode. Maybe one or two of us should ask him about how he felt he played the game/what his short and long term strategy was. Other than that I'm all for ignoring him.
If anyone has a burning passion to voice something with Dale, they can go ahead.
Otherwise, I think by refusing to play into his delusions, he will self implode. Maybe one or two of us should ask him about how he felt he played the game/what his short and long term strategy was. Other than that I'm all for ignoring him.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:01:44 pm
#6856
Yeah I get what you mean, when Drew got booted, I felt isolated man. So yeah somehow I get what you mean. But let's assume she runs to the end winning every immunity out there (tomorrow's the last?), will that somehow make her earn your vote?
Joaquin wrote:She played well, but I don't think she's as good as some of y'all think - I think she does lack some of the social nuance that I'd like in a winner (aka Val), which I can explain further if you don't understand. At the same time, this is Parvati syndrome (in HvV) - being associated with Russell was a pretty decently large reason she lost.
Yeah I get what you mean, when Drew got booted, I felt isolated man. So yeah somehow I get what you mean. But let's assume she runs to the end winning every immunity out there (tomorrow's the last?), will that somehow make her earn your vote?
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:03:21 pm
#6859
Val i feel is a stronger social/strategic player. Nad is quite strong socially and strategically, but because of flashy moves like playing 2 idols and winning a bunch of immunities, she looks like a stronger player. I think if they are both sitting in the end, their final speeches/ answers to questions are going to really determine which of them take the win.
Joaquin wrote:She played well, but I don't think she's as good as some of y'all think - I think she does lack some of the social nuance that I'd like in a winner (aka Val), which I can explain further if you don't understand. At the same time, this is Parvati syndrome (in HvV) - being associated with Russell was a pretty decently large reason she lost.
Val i feel is a stronger social/strategic player. Nad is quite strong socially and strategically, but because of flashy moves like playing 2 idols and winning a bunch of immunities, she looks like a stronger player. I think if they are both sitting in the end, their final speeches/ answers to questions are going to really determine which of them take the win.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:04:15 pm
#6862
If anything, that makes me want to vote her less. I have very specific views on Survivor, which I would love to talk to you about (I'm actually writing a research paper on it right now), one of which is that if you need immunity to get to the end, you don't deserve to win. I'm sure at least a decent amount of y'all will disagree.
If Nadiya doesn't win immunity and gets to the end that would earn her more respect in my eyes.
If Nadiya doesn't win immunity and gets to the end that would earn her more respect in my eyes.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:04:59 pm
#6863
If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.
Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.
Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:05:12 pm
#6864
As of now I would vote Val over Nadiya personally having seen how they played from day 1. If Nadiya can show a bit more prowess than just winning out, she could easily win me over though. I kind of hope they are both in the end to see them duke it out.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:05:31 pm
#6865
Hmm. I never saw that in that angle before. I assume that's why a lot of people don't think Fabio was a good winner (?). Any chance we can read any of your research paper about Survivor after the game?
And shit, Spurs lost.
Joaquin wrote:If anything, that makes me want to vote her less. I have very specific views on Survivor, which I would love to talk to you about (I'm actually writing a research paper on it right now), one of which is that if you need immunity to get to the end, you don't deserve to win. I'm sure at least a decent amount of y'all will disagree.
If Nadiya doesn't win immunity and gets to the end that would earn her more respect in my eyes.
Hmm. I never saw that in that angle before. I assume that's why a lot of people don't think Fabio was a good winner (?). Any chance we can read any of your research paper about Survivor after the game?
And shit, Spurs lost.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:06:38 pm
#6866
GS is going all the way baby!
Reed wrote:Joaquin wrote:If anything, that makes me want to vote her less. I have very specific views on Survivor, which I would love to talk to you about (I'm actually writing a research paper on it right now), one of which is that if you need immunity to get to the end, you don't deserve to win. I'm sure at least a decent amount of y'all will disagree.
If Nadiya doesn't win immunity and gets to the end that would earn her more respect in my eyes.
Hmm. I never saw that in that angle before. I assume that's why a lot of people don't think Fabio was a good winner (?). Any chance we can read any of your research paper about Survivor after the game?
And shit, Spurs lost.
GS is going all the way baby!
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:07:44 pm
#6867
Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.
Jeff Probst wrote:If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.
Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.
Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:08:46 pm
#6868
That's why ya had me bud
Reed wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.
Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.
Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.
That's why ya had me bud
- Tue May 10, 2016 10:09:33 pm
#6869
Naw, I got jaw slacked watching your greatness unfold. hahahah. but still, middle finger for that Jenn boot botch. HAHA the only time I tried to convince you post merge. THE ONE TIME. AND I FAILED. HAHA
Drew wrote:Reed wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:If you all had group-think it would be a pretty boring FTC, so just keep an open mind and you're all entitled to your opinions. Reed... your post # = scary.
Also, winners have been made and lost in the final tribal council answers, so we'll see how that plays into it certainly.
Dude, I held back when we merged, didn't want to cause something up. But yeah, I played way too passive.
That's why ya had me bud
Naw, I got jaw slacked watching your greatness unfold. hahahah. but still, middle finger for that Jenn boot botch. HAHA the only time I tried to convince you post merge. THE ONE TIME. AND I FAILED. HAHA